Legal Opinion

Battle Creek Bread Wrapping MacH. Co. v. Paramount Baking Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1934No. 5340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

Upon a title retaining contract, the plaintiff machine company sold and delivered to the defendant baking company a bread-wrapping machine and a bread-slicing machine. The machines are independent of each other in operation. On the face of the contract they are listed as follows:

One model Duplex Wrapping Machine .$4,000.00

One model Extra Intake . 250.00

One model Simplex Slicer (rebuilt) . 1,950.00

Total.$6,200.00

Following this total appear these words-:

Less allowance — for Model E .$ 600.00

Total.$5,600.00

The terms of payment are $1,400 cash on installation; and $4,200…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westminster Investment Co. v. McCurtainUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. LundUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sammis v. Marks, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bryant v. Bingham Stage LineUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. RodziewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Carver v. DennUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Canton Hardware Co. v. HallerOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API