Legal Opinion
Xerox Corp. v. Board of Tax Review
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 1997No. 15456PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff Xerox Corporation’s appeal from personal property tax assessments for the tax years 1990 through 1994 on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to provide the Hartford tax assessor (assessor) with sufficient information when it filed its tax lists. We conclude that the plaintiff provided the assessor with sufficient information, and, therefore, that the trial court should have conducted a de novo review to determine the value of the plaintiffs property for assessment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Hutensky v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Konover v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Narumanchi v. DeStefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Torres v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.