Legal Opinion
Torres v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1999No. SC 16051PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ J.
The principal issue in this tax appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the defendant tax assessor (defendant assessor) of the named defendant, the city of Waterbury (city),1 failed, when he assessed the condominium units at issue in this appeal, to comply with General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 12-64,2 which requires that all nonexempt property be taxed at a uniform rate. We conclude that the *112trial court properly found that the defendant assessor had complied with the statute.
The following facts and procedural history are pertinent to this appeal. Relying upon…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.