Legal Opinion

Beal v. El Dorado Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1931No. 29,831PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The proceeding was one for compensation. On appeal from an award of compensation made by the compensation commissioner, the district court made an award. The employer and its insurance carrier appeal. It is quite plain from the record that the insurance carrier, rather than the refining company, is earnest in contesting the award.

On December 15,1928, a pipe burst, and hot crude oil was thrown into claimant’s face and upon his head. He suffered partial loss of sight of one eye, partial loss of hearing of both ears, and was disfigured for life.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Matter of Sweeting v. . American Knife Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Honn v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. DamasiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Shaffer v. Midland Empire Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Wilson v. Brown-McDonald Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API