Legal Opinion

Honn v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1931No. 29,779PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. We shall speak of the workman as plaintiff and the employer and her insurance carrier as defendants. The plaintiff’s claim for compensation was allowed by the compensation commissioner, defendants appealed to the district court — where the record was reviewed and plaintiff’s claim allowed — and defendants have appealed.

Appellants first contend that plaintiff cannot maintain the proceeding for the reason that he did not serve on defendants a written claim for compensation within ninety days after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orendoc v. Kaw Steel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Murphy v. W. O. Cook Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Hering v. San Ore Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Redd v. Kansas Truck CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Stephenson v. Sugar Creek Packing & Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API