Legal Opinion

Matter of Sweeting v. . American Knife Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1919PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 25, 1918, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

The claimant was employed in the grinding department of the American Knife Company. The explosion of an emery wheel destroyed the bridge of his nose, giving him what is commonly called a flat nose, with deep scars upon his face. The state industrial commission made an -award of $2,500 for serious facial disfigurement. Subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, chap. 67) (as amended in 1916) provides that “ in case pf an injury resulting in serious facial or head disfigurement the commission may in its discretion, make such award or compensation as it may deem…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Matter of Erickson v. . PreussNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Goldman v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. DamasiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API