Legal Opinion
Brangman v. AstraZeneca, LP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-351PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Deborah Brangman brings suit against Defendants AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (“AstraZeneca”). Brangman alleges that AstraZeneca subjected her to disparate treatment on the basis of her race and gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VH’’), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Count I), and the Delaware Discrimination Employment Act (“DDEA”), 19 Del. C. 710 et seq. (Count II), and discriminated against her on the basis of her disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dianne Hyland v. Smyrna School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Moore v. CVS Rx Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Samuel Phifer v. Sevenson Environmental ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Bishop v. Kinard (In re Kinard)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- DeAngelis v. Capponi (In re Capponi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.