Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Aymett's Auto Arcade, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The finding corrected in so far as the record warrants discloses the following pertinent facts. The plaintiff, engaged in the business of selling heating and electrical equipment, by a written contract of November 3d, 1933, agreed to sell, and the defendant, engaged in the business of selling automobiles and conducting a gasoline filling station, to buy at the agreed price of $375, “1 Westinghouse Marr Power Burner installed with 275 gal. tank 17" fire pot . . . Capacity of burner 1200 ft. of radiation.” The defendant in contracting relied upon the plaintiff to select a suitable burner and to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Emery Thompson MacHine & Supply Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Keyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API