Legal Opinion

Himes v. Masonic Mut. Life Ass'n of District of Columbia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 3 Div. 775PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This action was brought by the appellant for the recovery of “first year premiums, bonuses, and commissions on renewal, under contract with the-[defendant] association as deputy and as. branch manager.” The defendant pleaded, several special pleas and the general issue, on which the case was tried, after demurrers were sustained to plaintiff’s replications, to the special pleas.

The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and the only question presented is upon plaintiff’s right to recover commissions on renewals accruing after the termination of his contract with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seiler v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Chase v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Wartensleben v. HaithcockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Sutherland v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bell v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Masden v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Johnson v. Country Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Buskuhl v. Family Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Stanbalt Realty Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Southern States Life Insurance Company v. AllanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API