Legal Opinion

Bell v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 6 Div. 489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This case comes here upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions, notwithstanding there was a judgment for the defendant. The trial court sustained the demurrers to many of the counts, and, whether properly so'or not, this action was without injury to the plaintiff, as he got the full benefit of these counts under count I and amended count D, to which the demurrer was overruled as these counts in varying form and language state the identical cause of action as the counts that were eliminated. Indeed, count I perhaps required less proof to establish the cause of action than some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Vines v. BuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Himes v. Masonic Mut. Life Ass'n of District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Kiker v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Dantzler v. Bagby Elevator and Electric CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Silverfield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API