Legal Opinion
Pickett v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1997No. 87506PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOPLIN, Judge:
Petitioner Norma Pickett (Claimant) seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion to reopen as time-barred by 85 O.S. 1991 § 43(C). Herein, Claimant asserts (1) she timely filed her motion to reopen and amendment thereto as to previously adjudicated injuries to both leg and back, and (2) the applicable statute of limitations was tolled by provision of medical treatment by Respondent Oklahoma Department of Human Services (Employer).
In March 1984, Claimant sustained com-pensable on-the-job injury to back, left hip, left leg (knee) and right ankle. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- City of Tulsa v. SmittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State ex rel. Mashburn v. SticeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- State v. District Court of Oklahoma CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Whitaker v. Hill Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.