Legal Opinion

Eckel v. Adair

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1984No. 59201PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPALA, Justice.(1) The issue to be dealt with on certiora-ri is whether the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of the trial court’s judgment on the defendants’ demurrers to the petition is legally incorrect? We answer in the negative because we find that the case stands here in a fatally defective posture.(2) The plaintiffs/appellants brought a class action 1 against several defendants. The trial court, after sustaining separate demurrers interposed by two of the defendants/appellees on the ground that the petition, as amended, failed to state a cause of action, terminated the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API