Legal Opinion

Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 3, 1995No. C3-95-675PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

FACTS

Jerome Mesenbourg (appellant) and Susan Baratío (respondent) lived in Minnesota and were married in Minnesota, On June 1, 1993, respondent served the summons for her petition for dissolution. At the commencement of the case, appellant lived in Saipan. Throughout the action, appellant lived in the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands and other Pacific island territories, and did not appear personally at any proceedings in this case. Appellant was represented by counsel at some hearings, however.

Appellant’s counsel argued at a hearing that the trial court did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. GRUNDTNER v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Bormann v. BormannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Marriage of Knapp v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API