Marriage of Knapp v. Knapp

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to vacate a dissolution judgment under Minn.Stat. § 518.145, subd. 2(1), without addressing the factors applicable to motions for relief under Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02.1 We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant James Knapp and respondent Marla Knapp were married on June 28, 1975.2 On June 3, 2014, James accepted service of Marla’s marriage-dissolution petition and a summons, which notified James that he had 30 days to answer the petition. Marla filed the petition in district court, and the court…