Legal Opinion
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1970No. 41964PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Theodore B. Knudson, Justice. *
Appeal by defendant Plymouth Optical Company, from a judgment awarding plaintiff recovery in the sum of $2,470.10.
In 1964, Paul MeJames and Dr. Warren Reyburn (an optometrist who lived near Duluth and who at the time of this action was employed by defendant) organized Paul’s Opticians, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as Paul’s). Paul’s entered into a franchise agreement with Plymouth Optical Company whereby the former was authorized by the latter to use the Plymouth Optical Company trade name in connection with the operation of Paul’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- McGee v. Breezy Point EstatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Noltimier v. NoltimierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Viking Fire Protection Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Gardner v. HermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Audrey L. Commerford v. Ronald O. Olson, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. LazereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.