Legal Opinion
Scahill v. Dist. of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 11, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16–2076 (JDB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court is [16] plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and for *16leave to amend their complaint. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court will assume familiarity with the facts of this case, as laid out in the prior Memorandum Opinion granting defendants' motion to dismiss ("Mem. Op.") [ECF No. 14]. See Scahill v. District of Columbia, 271 F.Supp.3d 216, 2017 WL 4280946 (D.D.C. Sept. 25, 2017). Plaintiffs Martin Scahill ("Scahill") and HRH Services, Inc. ("HRH") brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin Scahill & HRH Servs. LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- AARP v. U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Shvartser v. LekserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- (PC) Crowder v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Arthur v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.