Legal Opinion

Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1997No. CX-97-628Published

1Opinion of the Court

571 N.W.2d 47 (1997)

GROSSMAN INVESTMENTS, et al., Appellants,

v.

STATE of Minnesota, by Hubert H. HUMPHREY, III, its Attorney General, Respondent.

No. CX-97-628.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 18, 1997.

Geoffrey P. Jarpe, Maun & Simon, PLC, St. Paul, for appellants.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, Donald J. Mueting, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and KLAPHAKE and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Appellants Grossman Investments and Metropolitan Corporation challenge the trial court's denial of their petition for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Johnson v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API