In Re Estate of Blodgett
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETLI Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After being convicted of the criminally negligent homicide of his father, Robert Blodgett attempted to obtain the benefits devised to him under his father's will. Pursuant to Alaska's "slayer statute," 1 the superior court found that Blodgett was not entitled to inherit under the will as a result of his conviction, and that no manifest injustice resulted from this forfeiture. Blodgett attacks this decision on statutory and constitutional grounds. Because we agree with the superi- or court that Blodgett failed to prove that excluding him from the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Estate of HavilandWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Bibi v. ElfrinkAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. GreenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Beach v. Handforth-KomeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.