Legal Opinion

Upton v. Gould

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1944No. Civ. 12677PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

The defendant appeals from a decree of specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. On January 22, 1942, the parties executed a written contract of purchase and sale whereby defendant agreed to sell and convey to plaintiffs the real property in question for the sum of $4,550 “plus transfer charges such as assumption agreement, deed and revenue stamps. The above amount is to be paid as follows:

“Buyers agree to pay the sum of $75 on or before the first day of February, 1942, and a like sum of $75 on the first of each and every month thereafter until such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Puppo v. LarosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Boro v. RuzichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Janssen v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Am-Cal Investment Co. v. Sharlyn Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Chan v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. PerscalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Lund v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API