Chan v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Melvin E. Vaughan, Sr., and Rozelle Rainey Vaughan agreed to purchase real property from Chin Ott Wong and Quan Shee Wong. The Vaughans deposited certain money in escrow with the Title Insurance and Trust Company (hereinafter called the Title Company). The Wongs, claiming that “time was of the essence” of the agreement and that the Vaughans had defaulted in their payments, brought this action seeking a forfeiture of the escrow money. The action originally was commenced only against the Title Company as the escrow holder. Upon the latter’s motion, the Vaughans were substituted as defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pedrow v. FederoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Chin Ott Wong v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Murphy v. AblowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.