Hayward's v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by defendant Forte from a joint judgment against Mm and defendant Nelson for $5,592.07 in an action to recover the balance due for labor and materials furmshed and supplied by plaintiff.
Plaintiff, a corporation, brought the action against Forte and Nelson individually, as copartners, and as joint venturers. Nelson defaulted and judgment was entered against him. Forte answered, denying liability. The court found that Forte and Nelson became indebted to plaintiff as joint venturers.
In April 1952 Nelson told Forte about a lot that was to be sold for about $25,000 ■ that he could…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gardiner v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Nels E. Nelson, Inc. v. TarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Engineering Etc. Corp. v. Longridge Inv. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Redman v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.