Legal Opinion

Howell v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2001No. 00-3427PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Roger Howell, appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs former employer, General Motors Corporation (GM), and his union, the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 969 (UAW Local 969). Plaintiffs hybrid § 301/fair representation claims alleged breach of contract by GM, see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and breach of the duty of fair representation by the union, see Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 177, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). Plaintiff argues that the district court erred in finding that the hybrid §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Steward St. Elizabeth's Med. Ctr. of Bos., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Yordán v. American Postal Workers UnionDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
  3. Bloedow v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 594District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Garrish v. UNITED AUTO., AEROSPACE, AND AGRIC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API