Legal Opinion

Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 594

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 24, 2003No. CIV. 00-40291PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant General Motors Corporation and Defendants UAW and UAW Local 594. Defendants seek summary judgment on the issue of the statute of limitations only. The Court heard oral argument on June 25, 2003. For reasons set forth below, the Court shall grant Defendants’ motions.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are employees of Defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”) at its Truck and Bus facility in Pontiac, Michigan (“GM Truck and Bus”).…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrish v. UNITED AUTO., AEROSPACE, AND AGRIC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API