Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1906No. 3646PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle-theft, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

This case depends on circumstantial evidence. The proof on the part of the State shows that prosecutor, S. C. Fain, had a farm in the country, some six or seven miles from Hillsboro. His tenant, Mitchell, lived on said farm, having rented the same for the year. Prosecutor spent a good deal of his time on the farm with his tenant. Appellant lived some half mile from said farm and pursued the business of a butcher; that is, he would buy cattle in the neighborhood,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Coates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weathered v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Hennington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Wicklund v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Hankamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API