Say v. Barber

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendants as damages sustained by plaintiff as a result of an operation alleged to have been negligently performed on plaintiff’s face by the defendant, Doctor Foster M. Hull. Defendants ask a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action for malpractice, and that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings. In support of the first ground defendants claim that the complaint states no specific facts showing the negligence complained of or that contributed to the injury…