Thomason v. Carroll
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN,C.
—Action to foreclose a street-assessment lien. Defendants had judgment, from which and from the order denying motion for new trial they appeal.
It was admitted at the trial that the assessment, warrant, diagram, and certificate were all in due form, and that they constituted a prima facie case for plaintiffs, who are assignees of one C. F. Cormack, the contractor. The work ordered was for paving and laying granite curbs on Guerrero Street, between Eighteenth and Nineteenth streets, in the city and county of San Francisco, the total frontage of the work being 1,040 feet. It was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rauer v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Warren v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Andrews v. MetznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Georgeson v. SteinhoferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Say v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rhodes v. KochMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.