Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2008No. 20070250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Edward Curtis appealed from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of theft of property. We affirm, concluding: (1) Curtis’s constitutional right to compel attendance of witnesses was not violated; (2) Curtis’s prosecution was not precluded by the civil dispute doctrine; and (3) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

I

[¶ 2] On October 14, 2005, Curtis opened an account at Northland Educators Federal Credit Union, depositing a $55,540 check drawn on a Canadian bank. After converting the funds under the prevailing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. HartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlvaradoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. StridironNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CurtisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API