Legal Opinion

State v. Alvarado

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2008No. 20080107PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Abraham Alvarado appeals from a criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict finding him guilty of felonious restraint. We conclude the trial court did not err in admitting Cindy Alvarado’s testimony regarding prior acts of domestic violence, and there was sufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict of felonious restraint. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged Abraham Alvarado with felonious restraint in -violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-18-02(2) for knowingly restraining another under terrorizing circumstances by grabbing Cindy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. ChristensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Knudson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. AabrekkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. BuckleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HinojosaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API