Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 20080007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Danial Ray Curtis appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assaulting a police officer, disarming or attempting to disarm a law enforcement officer and preventing arrest or discharge of other duties. Curtis claims he was denied a fair trial because he did not receive assistance in subpoenaing witnesses for trial and because 'the district court failed to follow the appropriate procedure for answering requests from the jury during its deliberations. We hold Curtis’s request for subpoenas was not timely and ■ the error involving the jury…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Pemberton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. PendletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. RademacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. PendletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API