Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. 20030256, 20030257PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Steven Lennard Johnson appealed from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief and an order denying his motion to amend that order under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(b). We conclude the district court did not err in denying post-conviction relief because of res judicata, Johnson’s misuse of process, and Johnson’s failure to allege a valid claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as a matter of law. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In December 2000, Johnson was convicted by a jury of gross sexual imposition, a class A felony, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Alisha Ann Murphy v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API