Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 2009No. A07-110PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.

This case concerns the interpretation of Minnesota’s spousal maintenance statutes and the application of these statutes to retirement payments received from pension funds. After respondent Raymond Michael Lee retired, he brought a motion in the district court to modify his monthly maintenance obligation. The court lowered Raymond’s maintenance obligation from $825 per month to $700 per month. *633Raymond appealed, and the court of appeals eliminated his monthly maintenance payments altogether. Appellant Elaine Irene Lee challenges the holdings of the court of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Marriage of Haefele v. HaefeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Mayville v. MayvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Bass v. Equity Residential Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API