Dudley v. Sheehan Construction Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The petitioners, Burton E. Dudley and Chlora R. Pulsifer, are two of the children of Mary E. Dudley, late of Boston. They allege in a bill in equity in the Land Court that the “Administrator” (administratrix?) of the *145estate of their mother obtained the assignment of a mortgage covering the land of the decedent in Wakefield to a trustee for the estate and afterwards foreclosed the mortgage and caused the land to be conveyed to the respondent. The main prayer is for a reconveyance “to the Estate.”
The judge “sustained” a plea in bar of res judicata. It is plain that he used the word “sustained”…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Richmond Guano Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Sullivan v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- West v. Day Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Brown v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- O'DONOGHUE v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954