New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
On August 4, 1909, the defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiff, the lessee of the Boston and Albany Railroad, for the building of a concrete retaining wall approximately seven hundred feet in length along the northerly side of the location of the railroad at Brighton in this Commonwealth. The work was to be done in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the plaintiff’s engineer, and “All directions, explanations, superintendence, and instructions, spoken of, or required” under the contract also were to be given by the chief engineer or such “Engineers in charge of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wadhams v. Flagler GayIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Renwick v. MacomberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Boylston Housing Corp. v. O'TooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.