Legal Opinion
Carilli v. Hersey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 18, 1939PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This case has been here twice before. The plaintiff was a lessee of one Hersey and had sued Hersey and his agent Hettinger for specific performance of a contract not to sell the premises to another without first offering them to the plaintiff upon equally favorable terms. In the present suit she seeks to set aside a foreclosure sale to one McCarthy upon a mortgage given by Hersey to one Kreuzer prior to the lease to the plaintiff. When the case was first here we affirmed a final decree dismissing the bill. Carilli v. Hersey, 299 Mass. 139.
On the second occasion we affirmed a decree denying a…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Bolster v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.