Legal Opinion

People v. Dubrin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1965No. Crim. 9425PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

Appellant appeals from a convic tion of violation of section 487, subdivision 1 of the Penal Code. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

While the transactions involved are quite complicated there was substantial evidence to establish the following facts: In September 1957 appellant, through his agent Kassab, acquired a certain piece of real property, hereinafter called the Dumetz property, from a man and wife by the name of Garrison. At that time the property was subject to a trust deed for the benefit of the Bank of America…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Paterson v. ComastriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. KatzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Gonzales v. Mun. Court for the L.A. Judicial Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. National Steel Products Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API