Legal Opinion
National Steel Products Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1985No. E001352PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, J.
Petitioner, National Steel Products Company, seeks review of an order granting real party in interest, Jules Rosen dba Pantsmaker, discovery of a report prepared by an expert identified as a witness for petitioner in the instant case. Petitioner argues that the report should be non-discoverable because of the attorney-client and work product privileges, and, in the alternative, that the report should be discoverable only to the extent it is relevant.
The expert’s report is a technical engineering analysis of a metal building in New York. It was prepared in 1979 to assist…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & MarmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- 2,022 Ranch L.L.C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Shadow Traffic Network v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.