Legal Opinion

People v. Marsh

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1962No. Crim. 7178PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Defendants Marsh, Crane and Bateson were charged with attempted grand theft, conspiracy to commit grand theft, and conspiracy to violate section 2141 of the Business and Professions Code, the section prohibiting the practice of medicine without a license. They were convicted of all three offenses. Defendant Bateson has not appealed. Marsh and Crane appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The trial was a protracted one. The prosecution produced substantial evidence that defendants, none of whom possessed a medical license, worked together…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. CroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. ErvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API