Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Pettit

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1926No. 16690PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

The facts in the case, as stated in plaintiffs’ amended petition, alleged that one Daniel West, deceased, received a patent from the U. S. government, covering the following described property;

“All of the west one-half and the southeast quarter of section 17, township 20, north range 7 east of the Indian Meridian, containing 120 acres, more or less.”

It was alleged in .said petition that Lucinda J. West Moorman was the wife of Daniel West, deceased, and the other plaintiffs in error in this case are the surviving children of Lucinda J. West Moorman and Daniel West, deceased.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Weaver v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Potter v. ErtelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Smith v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Ellison v. BeannabiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harrison v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Griffith v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. West v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. In Re Trope's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API