Legal Opinion

City of Seminole v. Fields

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1935No. 24358PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

On October 7, 1931, C. R. Fields and Myrtle Fields, as plaintiffs, commenced an action in the superior court of Seminole county, Okla., to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by them as owners of certain described real estate located in the city of Seminole, Okla. They asserted, in substance, that on or about the 15th day of May, 1930, the city of Seminole, acting through its officers and agents, had constructed a dam near their property, thus impounding a large body of water which overflowed and stood upon their premises. They treated the injury as a total and permanent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BeboutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Nero v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Shull v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Town of FairfaxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Southwestern Natural Gas Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Rogers v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Harris v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API