Legal Opinion

United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided May 3, 1960No. A.R.D. 122; Entry No. 306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of the trial court, holding that there was no foreign, export, or United States value for merchandise described as steel concrete reinforcing bars or stressed or prestressed steel bars and finding value on the basis of cost of production. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 545, Reap. Dec. 9334. That decision also involved nuts and washers imported to be used with the steel bars, but no appeal has been filed in respect to them.

The merchandise before us was imported for the account of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Arditi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Arditi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Chas. E. Washburn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis Goldey Co.United States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Tanous v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API