Legal Opinion

Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 7, 1954No. Reap. Dec. 8276; Entry No. 2454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Plaintiff herein imported 1,000 tennis racket frames from Australia for the account of Pacific Coast Racket Distributing Co. of Los Angeles. The importation consisted of five different styles of frames, there being 200 of each variety. This merchandise was entered at the port of Los Angeles, Calif, at the invoice prices, plus *54810 per centum, plus cases and packing. The details of the entered and appraised values are as follows:

Invoice description Entered value (Australian currency) Appraised value (Australian currency)

Finalist 32/3 40/0

Regent 27/9 35/3

Minerva 22/3 29/3

Challenge 20/6…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ford Motor Co.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Eggen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Maddox v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API