Legal Opinion

Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 27, 1970No. R.D. 11693; Entry No. 103767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this appeal for re-appraisement consists of two Broadbent automatic sugar centrifugal units and fitments, exported from England to Hawaii on or about September 15, 1967. It was entered at the port of Honolulu at the invoice price of £15,803 ($44,071) and was appraised at £16,870 plus carriage, cases and labor, as shown on the special customs invoice.

The merchandise is on the final list promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury (93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521) and was appraised on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. United States v. Knit WitsUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Rattancraft of California v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API