Legal Opinion

United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided March 11, 1959No. A.R.D. 102; Entry No. A-4897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Appellee (plaintiff below) appealed for the re-appraisement of certain doors, constructed with patented ventilation, which were imported from Canada at Rouses Point, N.Y. The trial judge, from whose decision the Government has taken this appeal, found on the evidence of record that there was neither a foreign value nor an export value for such or similar merchandise, nor any United States value for such or similar merchandise. Accordingly, the trial judge held that the appraisement of these doors should be on the basis of the cost of their production, and he found the values of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pleissner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Alaska United Gold Min. Co. v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. Keve v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. International Graphite & Electrode Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fashion Ribbon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Maher-App & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. United States v. H. A. Gogarty, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API