Legal Opinion

Arditi v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 27, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8610; Entry Nos. 74147; 74146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, involve canned corned beef exported from Peru on May 21, 1962. The merchandise was described on the invoices as #1 Argentine Pampa brand corned beef and was packed in 12-ounce cans, 48 cans to the case. It was entered at $12.50 per case (U. S. currency), less nondutiable charges, and appraised at 240 Peru soles per case, net packed.

The evidence herein is entirely documentary and consists of three affidavits of Jacques Varsano (plaintiff's exhibits 1, 2, and 3); an operations memorandum and attached papers, from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. United States v. A. Orlikoff of Mexican Artcraft Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Chas. E. Washburn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Chas. E. Washburn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arditi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Arditi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Arditi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API