Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Lois L. Sinert, in this negligence action. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury as to the law as stated in Kraus v. Newton, 211 Conn. 191, 558 A.2d 240 (1989), (2) failed to render judgment for the defendants because the only evidence presented was that a storm was in progress at the time of the fall and under Connecticut law there is no duty to remedy the effects of a storm until a reasonable time after the storm ends, (3) denied the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Kraus v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Warren v. StancliffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sheeler v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cooks v. O'Brien Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Munsill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
- Umsteadt v. G. R. RealtyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Dominguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Johnson v. PikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.