Legal Opinion

Sheeler v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQ’Suluvan, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by a fall upon a sidewalk in the defendant city. She relied on two causes of action. The jury returned a general verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s appeal is from the denial of its motion to set the verdict aside and from the judgment. It is necessary to consider only the latter phase of the appeal.

The plaintiff claimed to have proved the following facts: Savings Street is a public highway in the city of Waterbury. In the vicinity of the Armory building, so-called, the southerly sidewalk, at the time in question, had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Bacon v. Town of Rocky HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Wright v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API