Legal Opinion

Kashner v. Geisinger Clinic

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1994No. 317PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the December 28,1992 order denying appellants’ Motion for Additur and/or a New Trial on Damages. Appellants, Barbara and George Kashner, present the following questions for our review:

A. Did the Trial Judge err by refusing to permit the jury to consider medical bills in the amount of $241,089.31 incurred by Plaintiff Barbara Kashner because those bills had been “paid” by a separate, although related, corporate entity?

B. Did this action violate the “Collateral Source Rule”?

Appellants’ Brief at 3. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. In Re Estate of HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Haselden v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Shared Communications Services of 1800-80 JFK Boulevard Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Properties Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. General Nutrition Corp. v. Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API