Lusk v. White
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by George D. White against James W. Lusk and • others, receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLIER, C.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by the defendant in -error by reason of the negligence of the plaintiffs in error. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.
There are two causes of action set up in the petition. The first cause of action is to recover for injuries received, which occurred on the 5th day of September, 1914, and the averments of negligence as to the same are that the car on track No. 4 had carelessly and negligently been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hobbs v. Brush Electric Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Blaine v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Marks v. Bank of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. HastySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Lakey v. North McAlester Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.