Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Brush Electric Light Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Case for injuries alleged to have been received through the-negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant to trim its lamps, and, while so employed, fell from a pole to the ground, a distance of 25 feet, and was severely injured.

He alleges that the accident was caused by the negligence of the company in not providing a proper guard to sustain him while in the act of cleaning the lamp. This guard was a loop of wire, which was suspended from the top of the lamp frame, and passed around under his arms, and in performing his work this wire was required to sustain nearly the weight of his body. The defect claimed was that this wire was too light, and lacked…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Sullivan v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API