Legal Opinion

Blaine v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 22, 1897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. (1) The interpretation placed upon the contract by the petition is the only one consistent with the words and provisions thereof, and the only one which makes it reasonable and just as between the parties. ■Goode v. St. Louis, 113 Mo. 257; The Huse-Loomis Ice <& Trans.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. (1) The interpretation placed upon the contract by the petition is the only one consistent with the words and provisions thereof, and the only one which makes it reasonable and just as between the parties. ■Goode v. St. Louis, 113 Mo. 257; The Huse-Loomis Ice <& Trans. Go. v. Heinze, 102 Mo. 245; Lilis v. Harrison, 104 Mo. 270; Johnson County v. Wood, 84 Mo. 489; Bishop on Contracts, sec. 588; 2 Parsons on Contracts, pp. 494-499. (1) The averments of the petition as to the legal effect of the contract sued upon are not admitted by the demurrer. (2)…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

This action was begun in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis for damages for the breach of a contract theretofore entered into by plaintiff and Chas. W. Knapp, publisher of the Republic, a newspaper published in said city. The petition, leaving off the formal parts, is as follows:

“And now comes the plaintiff, William T. Blaine, and for cause of action states that the defendant Publishers George Knapp & Company, is and was at the time herein mentioned, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Missouri for the object of printing and publishing newspapers, periodicals,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Buffalo Catholic Institute v. . BitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Koehler v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lusk v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Shepherd v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. Cann v. Rector of Church of the RedeemerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Forbs v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Hubbard v. Turner Department Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API